8 results for 'cat:"Fraud" AND cat:"Interference With Contract" AND cat:"Contract"'.
J. Leinenweber denies the originally sued insurance firm’s motion to transfer this case to Utah, and partially grants the originally suing insurance and capital firms’ motion to dismiss their opponents’ fraud, conspiracy, wage law violation and tort claims. This is a convoluted contract dispute arising from a number of businesspeople who passed their insurance and capital firms between each other and spent time working for each other. Now, in claims and counter-claims, they accuse each other of business malfeasance of various stripes, which the court attempts to simplify in this ruling eliminating all but three claims several of the parties on both sides face.
Court: USDC Northern District of Illinois, Judge: Leinenweber, Filed On: March 5, 2024, Case #: 1:23cv1109, NOS: Other Contract - Contract, Categories: fraud, Tort, interference With Contract
Vice Chancellor Zurn denies the former officers' summary judgment motion seeking advancement of litigation fees and expenses in a federal action asserting fraud and contract claims. As a gating issue, an arbitration provision in the company's operating agreement is inapplicable, and because the operating agreement was amended and then supplanted by a new agreement, the former officers' advancement rights may have been repealed.
Court: Delaware Chancery Court, Judge: Zurn, Filed On: January 17, 2024, Case #: 2023-0813-MTZ, Categories: fraud, interference With Contract, Attorney Fees
J. Hendon finds the business owner's motion for a petition of certiorari in her dispute with the former vice president and general counsel of one of her businesses including fraud, misrepresentation and breach of contract claims must be granted. The portion of the trial court's partial final judgment calling for the immediate execution of an order demanding a $126,808 payment from the business owner is quashed, in part because "intertwined factual matters" in the case still need to be resolved.
Court: Florida Courts Of Appeal, Judge: Hendon, Filed On: January 10, 2024, Case #: 22-1941, Categories: fraud, interference With Contract, Enforcement Of Judgments
J. Kendall partially grants Walgreen’s motion to dismiss fraudulent inducement and contract breach claims brought by an electronic accessories company. The accessories company claims it paid Walgreen's to place its products in “premium” locations of Walgreen’s stores, but underlying contract disputes sullied the arrangement. The court mostly allows the accessory company’s contract claims to go forward, only dismissing a portion of one claim dealing with Walgreen’s alleged failure to pay for “sold and delivered” goods.
Court: USDC Northern District of Illinois, Judge: Kendall, Filed On: November 30, 2023, Case #: 1:23cv303, NOS: Other Contract - Contract, Categories: fraud, interference With contract, contract
Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for Free
J. Ecker finds the trial court properly ruled in favor of the home health care company on claims of tortious interference with a contract against its competitor. Statements made by the competitor's executive during litigation against a state agency regarding implementation of a new billing system were verifiably false and allowed the competitor to poach more than 80 clients when the home health care company's contract was terminated by the agency. Repeated statements from an executive that his company did not plan to implement the new billing system and would not poach clients also allowed the home health care company to prove damages in excess of $118,000 based on lost clients. Affirmed.
Court: Connecticut Supreme Court, Judge: Ecker, Filed On: October 6, 2023, Case #: SC20642, Categories: fraud, Health Care, interference With Contract
J. Bell refuses to dismiss Boeing's fraud action against a company arising from the company's buyout of one of Boeing's contracted aircraft suppliers, which it allegedly forced to declare bankruptcy only months after the purchase. Boeing sufficiently pleads its claims for fraudulent misrepresentation, unfair and deceptive trade practices, tortious interference with contract and related claims.
Court: USDC Western District of North Carolina, Judge: Bell, Filed On: June 28, 2023, Case #: 3:22CV481, NOS: Other Fraud - Torts - Personal Property, Categories: fraud, interference With contract, contract